Series63試験無料問題集「FINRA Uniform Securities Agent State Law Examination 認定」
A broker-dealer of commodity futures contracts has been profiting by trading for its own account either before or after executing a client's trade on the same commodity, depending on which will be most advantageous.
Under the Uniform Securities Act, the broker-dealer is guilty of
Under the Uniform Securities Act, the broker-dealer is guilty of
正解:D
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Constance is an investment adviser representative. She told one of her clients that he should put at least 15% of his investment monies in a U.S. government bond mutual fund.
She explained that she believed that he required this percentage to meet his liquidity needs, and U.S.
government bond funds are risk-free. A few months later, the client needed to sell some of his fund shares in order to pay some medical bills and was surprised to discover that he lost money on the sale because the net asset value of the fund had dropped.
Was Constance guilty of any securities violations?
She explained that she believed that he required this percentage to meet his liquidity needs, and U.S.
government bond funds are risk-free. A few months later, the client needed to sell some of his fund shares in order to pay some medical bills and was surprised to discover that he lost money on the sale because the net asset value of the fund had dropped.
Was Constance guilty of any securities violations?
正解:B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Ms. Naivete gave Mr. Smooth, owner of Smooth Construction, $40,000 in return for a promissory note that promised to pay interest at the rate of 8% a quarter, with a repayment of principal at the end of two years. The money would be used by Mr. Smooth to rehab a few beach condo units that had been severely hurricane-damaged and that Mr. Smooth had been able to purchase for "pennies on the dollar," or so he said.
The first units would be completed within a month, and the rents would be used to make the interest payments.
The investment was almost as risk-free as U.S. government bonds, Mr. Smooth claimed. By the end of the second year, Ms. Naivete had received a lot of fast talk and only one of the promised interest payments.
Have there been any violation of securities laws in this instance?
The first units would be completed within a month, and the rents would be used to make the interest payments.
The investment was almost as risk-free as U.S. government bonds, Mr. Smooth claimed. By the end of the second year, Ms. Naivete had received a lot of fast talk and only one of the promised interest payments.
Have there been any violation of securities laws in this instance?
正解:B
解答を投票する
解説: (GoShiken メンバーにのみ表示されます)