プライバシーセキュリティ保護

現在の状況を考慮して、調査を行ったところ、ほとんどのお客様がプライバシーの漏洩について心配していることがわかりました。 ここでOGEA-102試験準備はあらゆる顧客の個人情報を保護することをお約束したます。 お客様のプライバシーについては、OGEA-102試験対策でお客様の権利を厳重に保護し、違法な犯罪行為に反対いたします。 OGEA-102試験問題集を選択した場合は、効果的な保護対策であなたのプライバシーを安全に保つことをお約束します。 あなたと何かトラブルがあることを考えると、弊社にメッセージ、またはメールを送ることができます。 弊社のOGEA-102テスト問題セットがあなたの期待に応じるよう心から願っています。

TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam認定を取得したいという意欲のある人には、主にサラリーマンが含まれます。 彼らはより高い地位に到達し、さらに、ハンサムな給料を得ることを期待しています、さらに、繁栄した未来。 OGEA-102テスト連続を通して、さらなる発展のための高効率的な学習態度を構築するのを助けるようにそのような効率的な研究計画を設計することを期待します。 学習教材は、学生やオフィスワーカー、長年の経験を持つグリーンハンド、またはスタッフメンバーに関係なく、すべての候補者を対象としています。OGEA-102認定トレーニングは、あなたにとって絶対に良い選択です。 したがって、試験に合格することができるかどうかを心配する必要はありません。これは、弊社の技術力で成功することを保証するためです。

効率的な学習計画

実際のところ、長時間の勉強は必要ではありませんが、質の高い効率的な学習が成功するための鍵となる方法です。 複雑な知識を単純化し、学習内容を習得しやすいようにOGEA-102テスト連続をいくつか用意しています。貴重な時間を短縮しながら、より重要な知識を得ることができます。 TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Examガイド連続は時間管理とシミュレーションテスト機能を備えています、それはスピードを調整して効率を改善するために警戒を続けるのを助けるために時間管理者をセットアップするのにとても役に立ちます。 私たちのエキスパートチームはOGEA-102認証トレーニングで試験を準備するためにあなたが20-30時間しか必要としないことを高効率のトレーニングプロセスを設計しました。 全体的な20-30時間のトレーニング計画で、OGEA-102テスト連続であなたが一日にどのくらいの時間を費やすつもりであるかについて思い出させるために自分自身を思い出させるために小さなやるリストを作ることもできます。

The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 認定 OGEA-102 試験問題:

1. Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are the Lead Enterprise Architect at a major agribusiness company. The company's main harvest is lentils, a highly valued food grown worldwide. The lentil parasite, broomrape, has been an increasing concern for many years and is now becoming resistant to chemical controls. In addition, changes in climate favor the propagation and growth of the parasite. As a result, the parasite cannot realistically be exterminated, and it has become pandemic, with lentil yields falling globally.
In response to the situation, the CEO has decided that the lentil fields will be used for another harvest. The company will also cease to process third-party lentils and will repurpose its processing plants. Thus, the target market will change, and the end-products will be different and more varied.
The company has recently established an Enterprise Architecture practice based on the TOGAF standard as method and guiding framework. The CIO is the sponsor of the activity. A formal request for architecture change has been approved. At this stage there is no fixed scope, shared vision, or objectives.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to propose the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO's change in direction for the company.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A) You propose that this engagement define the baseline Technology Architecture first in order to assess the current infrastructure capacity and capability for the company. Then the focus should be on transition planning and incremental architecture deployment. This will identify requirements to ensure that the projects are sequenced in an optimal fashion so as to realize the change.
B) You propose that the priority is to produce a new Request for Architecture Work leading to development of a new Architecture Vision. The trade-off method should be applied to identify and select an architecture satisfying the stakeholders. For an efficient change the EA team should be aligned with the organization's planning, budgeting, operational, and change processes.
C) You propose that the team focus on architecture definition including development of business models, with emphasis on defining the change parameters to support this new business strategy that the CEO has identified. Once understood, the team will be in the best position to identify the requirements, drivers, issues, and constraints for the change.
D) You propose that the team uses the architecture definition document and focus on architecture development starting simultaneously phases B, C and D. This is because the CEO has identified the need to change. This will ensure that the change can be defined in a structured manner and address the requirements needed to realize the change.

2. Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are the Chief Enterprise Architect at a large food service company specializing in sales to trade and wholesale, for example, restaurants and other food retailers.
One of your company's competitors has launched a revolutionary product range and is running a very aggressive marketing campaign. Your company's resellers are successively announcing that they are not interested in your company's products and will sell your competitor's.
The CEO has stated there must be significant change to address the situation. He has made it clear that new markets must be found for the company's products, and that the business needs to pivot, and address the retail market as well as the existing wholesale market.
A consideration is the company's ability and willingness to change its business model, and if it is a temporary or permanent change. An additional risk factor is one of culture. The company has been used to a stable business with a reasonably well known and settled client base - all with its own local understandings and practices.
The CEO is the sponsor of the EA program within the company. You have been engaged with the sales, logistics, production, and marketing teams, enabling the architecture activity to start. An Architecture Vision, Architecture Principles, and Requirements have all been agreed. As you move forward to develop a possible Target Architecture you have identified that some of the key stakeholders' preferences are incompatible. The incompatibilities are focused primarily on time-to-market, cost savings, and the need to bring out a fully featured product range, but there are additional factors.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked how you will address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A) You recommend that since the CEO has stated that the company must pivot, it is better to compromise on a full product range rather than time-to-market. You would develop just enough of the Target Architecture to demonstrate fitness of the proposed approach. You would limit the description to just where there is a gap between the current baseline. You would seek approval by the stakeholders to move forward with developing the Target Architecture in detail.
B) You would seek to understand value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders. You would develop alternative Target Architectures, highlighting the gaps between current state and the alternatives. You would consider combining features from one or more alternatives in collaboration with the stakeholders. A formal stakeholder review should then be held to decide which alternative is fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. You will then secure the funding required.
C) You would use the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements to define a set of criteria for alternatives and create a set of architecture views to illustrate the impact of the alternative Target Architectures. You would identify the impact on planned projects. You would understand the strengths and weaknesses of the alternatives. You would conduct a formal stakeholder review to decide which alternative to move forward with. You will determine the funding required.
D) You would review the Stakeholder Map and ensure that you have addressed and represented the concerns of all department heads. You will involve them in resolving the incompatibilities. The Communications Plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture with and how incompatibilities were resolved to reflects the stakeholders' requirements. You will check with each key stakeholder they are satisfied with how the incompatibilities have been resolved.

質問と回答：